<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Server Based Computing versus Virtual Desktop Infrastructure</title>
	<atom:link href="http://citrixblogger.org/2008/08/03/server-based-computing-versus-virtual-desktop-infrastructure/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://citrixblogger.org/2008/08/03/server-based-computing-versus-virtual-desktop-infrastructure/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 11:44:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeffreymuir</title>
		<link>http://citrixblogger.org/2008/08/03/server-based-computing-versus-virtual-desktop-infrastructure/#comment-1516</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jeffreymuir]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 23:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citrixblogger.wordpress.com/?p=290#comment-1516</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rob,

All good points.  Having a better story with regards to multimedia is seen as one of the most important factors in acceptance of XenDesktop.  Fortunately there is work being done to address this in Project Apollo.  It is even possible to request access to the latest tech preview at http://www.citrix.com/English/ss/downloads/details.asp?downloadId=1340963&amp;productId=163057 . 

Thanks,
Jeff]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob,</p>
<p>All good points.  Having a better story with regards to multimedia is seen as one of the most important factors in acceptance of XenDesktop.  Fortunately there is work being done to address this in Project Apollo.  It is even possible to request access to the latest tech preview at <a href="http://www.citrix.com/English/ss/downloads/details.asp?downloadId=1340963&#038;productId=163057" rel="nofollow">http://www.citrix.com/English/ss/downloads/details.asp?downloadId=1340963&#038;productId=163057</a> . </p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Nicholson</title>
		<link>http://citrixblogger.org/2008/08/03/server-based-computing-versus-virtual-desktop-infrastructure/#comment-1512</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob Nicholson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 01:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citrixblogger.wordpress.com/?p=290#comment-1512</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The show stopper for us with SBC (currently XenApp users) is multimedia performance. Sure, there are some companies who can dictate what users do on their computers but this is at odds with initatives like the &quot;Employee owned computer&quot;. It (poor video, Flash and PPT animation) is becoming a show stopper for us. If you can crack that one guys, I&#039;ll buy into the virtualised desktop. I agree that desktop virtualisaton is a branch of SBC albiet pretty different under the hood.

In the meantime, we&#039;re looking at the technologies to stream applications and maybe complete operating systems down to the desktop. We&#039;re not in a hurry to loose the advantages SBC gives us but the pressure to run PPT, Flash &amp; videos in our sector is becoming strong to resist.

There is a oxymoron going on here - &quot;Hey, look at Vista &amp; MAC - aren&#039;t these new interfaces wonderful&quot; and &quot;ahh, but of course you can&#039;t have them on virtualised desktops&quot;...

Rob.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The show stopper for us with SBC (currently XenApp users) is multimedia performance. Sure, there are some companies who can dictate what users do on their computers but this is at odds with initatives like the &#8220;Employee owned computer&#8221;. It (poor video, Flash and PPT animation) is becoming a show stopper for us. If you can crack that one guys, I&#8217;ll buy into the virtualised desktop. I agree that desktop virtualisaton is a branch of SBC albiet pretty different under the hood.</p>
<p>In the meantime, we&#8217;re looking at the technologies to stream applications and maybe complete operating systems down to the desktop. We&#8217;re not in a hurry to loose the advantages SBC gives us but the pressure to run PPT, Flash &amp; videos in our sector is becoming strong to resist.</p>
<p>There is a oxymoron going on here &#8211; &#8220;Hey, look at Vista &amp; MAC &#8211; aren&#8217;t these new interfaces wonderful&#8221; and &#8220;ahh, but of course you can&#8217;t have them on virtualised desktops&#8221;&#8230;</p>
<p>Rob.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeanne Johnson</title>
		<link>http://citrixblogger.org/2008/08/03/server-based-computing-versus-virtual-desktop-infrastructure/#comment-1492</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeanne Johnson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 22:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citrixblogger.wordpress.com/?p=290#comment-1492</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No one is better educated or positioned to talk about VDI as a concept than someone who knows application deployment through Terminal Services and Citrix.  

Virtualization engineers, cloistered and protected in the data center for the last couple of years, have no idea the pain they are about to experience out in the VDI jungle of users, apps, printers, scanners and other devices that exist outside the DC.  

It is our opinion that both VDI and SBC as concepts are required for an optimal deployment and as &#039;clouds&#039; are talked about more - and resources move farther away - we believe that the old Citrix mantra of any app, anytime, from anywhere is the strongers message ever.  ...Sure hope they figure it all out in time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No one is better educated or positioned to talk about VDI as a concept than someone who knows application deployment through Terminal Services and Citrix.  </p>
<p>Virtualization engineers, cloistered and protected in the data center for the last couple of years, have no idea the pain they are about to experience out in the VDI jungle of users, apps, printers, scanners and other devices that exist outside the DC.  </p>
<p>It is our opinion that both VDI and SBC as concepts are required for an optimal deployment and as &#8216;clouds&#8217; are talked about more &#8211; and resources move farther away &#8211; we believe that the old Citrix mantra of any app, anytime, from anywhere is the strongers message ever.  &#8230;Sure hope they figure it all out in time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Powers</title>
		<link>http://citrixblogger.org/2008/08/03/server-based-computing-versus-virtual-desktop-infrastructure/#comment-1360</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob Powers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 11:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citrixblogger.wordpress.com/?p=290#comment-1360</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Boy, Dell is about to get &quot;delled&quot;, why would I buy a pc in the future when I can rent the latest desktop when I can rent it monthly from my cloud/service provider? They hear footsteps. The only thing holding us back is rich gaming remoting.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boy, Dell is about to get &#8220;delled&#8221;, why would I buy a pc in the future when I can rent the latest desktop when I can rent it monthly from my cloud/service provider? They hear footsteps. The only thing holding us back is rich gaming remoting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Server Based Computing versus Virtual Desktop Infrastructure &#171; EarlyBert</title>
		<link>http://citrixblogger.org/2008/08/03/server-based-computing-versus-virtual-desktop-infrastructure/#comment-1359</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Server Based Computing versus Virtual Desktop Infrastructure &#171; EarlyBert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 16:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citrixblogger.wordpress.com/?p=290#comment-1359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] August 4, 2008 by Bert Bouwhuis    Jeff Muir is een medewerker van de Citrix Advanced Products Group bij Sydney. Hij verbaast zich over de ophef ten aanzien van de vermeende strijd tussen Server Based Computing (SBC) en Virtual Desktop Infrastructures (VDI). Hij raadt Citrix dan ook sterk aan om de beide oplossingen te verenigen in &#233;&#233;n product. En omdat hij blijkbaar niet veel vertrouwen heeft in een serieuze opvolging binnen Citrix heeft hij besloten zijn oproep publiekelijk op zijn weblog te plaatsen&#8230; [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] August 4, 2008 by Bert Bouwhuis    Jeff Muir is een medewerker van de Citrix Advanced Products Group bij Sydney. Hij verbaast zich over de ophef ten aanzien van de vermeende strijd tussen Server Based Computing (SBC) en Virtual Desktop Infrastructures (VDI). Hij raadt Citrix dan ook sterk aan om de beide oplossingen te verenigen in &#233;&#233;n product. En omdat hij blijkbaar niet veel vertrouwen heeft in een serieuze opvolging binnen Citrix heeft hij besloten zijn oproep publiekelijk op zijn weblog te plaatsen&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

