Category Archives: Video

Ego-less Genius

A few years ago, I participated in a seminar about creativity.  Since then there have been several email updates about creativity in the business world.  From the latest email, there was a link to a speech from Elizabeth Gilbert.  You never know exactly what you are going to get with these kind of emails but this one turned out to be quite interesting.  Elizabeth is a writer and has just recently had a major success with her book “Eat, Pray, Love”.  She has struggled with the creative process much like any other artist.

If you are still interested, please watch the Elizabeth’s TED talk before continuing reading this post.  She explains it much better than I could.

In her career, she has noticed that writing has always been full of turmoil.  So many successful writers have met their doom even at their own hands.  Elizabeth questioned why it is this way.  Research led to an answer that was unexpected.  In ancient times creativity was seen as something that lived outside humanity.  It was seen as more like a spirit that influenced artists that were willing to listen.  Roman and Greek civilizations were heavily influenced by the view that creativity was at the mercy of the gods.

Modern times starting with the Renaissance shifted the creative process solely to the artist.  This shift seems innocent based on our focus on science and technology.  Unfortunately it puts too much pressure on the creative people.  If they consider themselves to be the sole source of original thought, they are also more likely to form regret and blame themselves when things go wrong.  Elizabeth points out that it is far healthier to keep the credit and blame outside the person.  She talks of how genius used to have a different definition.  It used to refer to the outside influence trying to reach the people creating.  Now it is seen as a statement of the ego.

For a number of reasons, her approach is refreshing.  Creative thinking no longer is limited to the framework of how we currently think.  The most imaginative influences often come from the most unlikely sources.  It makes sense that being this creative is not something than can be performed in the model of an island.  Acceptance of new outside ideas creates a mixed pot of blended concepts.  From this brew come really new ideas.

Regardless, it is very cool to see this kind of insight available on the Internet.  With views like this, we are well on our way to a much more interesting future.

Bill Gates – Looking Back, Moving Ahead

 

Bill Gates - Looking Back, Moving Ahead

Bill Gates - Looking Back, Moving Ahead

Just today I was looking for some Microsoft videos related to MMS 2008 when I located some video gems about Bill Gates and his history at Microsoft.  The Microsoft web site is providing a collection of videos for use with the press.  The primary video revolves around Bill Gates.  It contains some very interesting new material and includes a number of interviews with very famous Microsoft employees and even some of Bill Gates’ family.  The video collection is of very high quality and shows a great deal of production work went into it.  If you have any interest in Microsoft or Bill Gates, I highly recommend watching them.

To get the full list of videos, go here.

There are a number of stories from the various interviews that you might find interesting.  For example, there is a video clip dedicated to the 1978 picture of the original 11 Microsoft employees in Albuquerque.

In a way, the Bill Gates video is a summation of his work until now.  It was built to acknowledge his accomplishments during his departure in June 2008.  Regardless of how you feel about him, it is clear that he succeeded even though he dropped out of Harvard.

His Dad has a great quote towards the beginning of the video.  He basically says that “we didn’t know that we have something world-class going on in our living room”.  Nothing like a parent to set you straight :) .  I’m sure it was a joke but it does indicate how proud his father is.

The main video is fifteen minutes long and is well worth it.  It is more like a documentary you would see on TV than a typical company promotional video.

Shawn Bass at Geek Speak Live 2008

Earlier this year, Citrix created a new track as part of Citrix Synergy in Houston.  This track, which was called “Geek Speak Live”, was intended to address the more technical aspects of Citrix products.  Not only that, it was intended to be largely driven by outside speakers.

The new model was very successful and addressed a gap in the standard Citrix events.  Traditionally Citrix has not satisfied the needs of the most technical administrators, analysts, and resellers.  The typical statement heard is that Citrix events are too marketing based.

“Geek Speak Live” was Citrix’s first serious attempt to bridge the gap and bring the technical community online.  Much work was put together by the evangelist group to try something different.

Keep in mind that Citrix’s VDI offering had just been released (XenDesktop) just earlier on the first day.  Later that evening, Shawn Bass gave a presentation about the limitations of VDI.  I just discovered this week that his VDI speech is available from Brightcove.  When this first happened (quite a few months ago) it caused a stir within Citrix.  Some people saw it as inappropriate, especially based on XenDesktop just being released.  I didn’t have enough evidence to judge then.  From the general reactions inside the company, it had seemed that perhaps Shawn had gone too far.

However, now that I have seen Shawn at BriForum and have seen this video, I would conclude that the initial stir was a misunderstanding.  Perhaps people saw Shawn as bashing VDI when really he is just trying to warn about the current limitations.  He is trying to deflate the hype curve and make people realize the true value of VDI.

Shawn is a very clever and passionate person.  He strongly believes that the truth be told.  This was obvious during BriForum on the topics he covered there.  If Shawn is telling you to watch out for something, then it would make sense that you should.

Another aspect of this that only through constructive criticism will products improve.  VDI is destined to get quite a bit better in the next few years.  Shawn’s observations highlight the areas that need the most improving.  As he said during the session, VDI should not be seen as a panacea.

Based on several comments during BriForum, technical people are hungry for technical content.  They, in general, are fed up with marketing messages.  Along with that, they want the freedom to express their opinions.  They want honesty and they want to be heard.  So many times, the word “refreshing” was mentioned at BriForum compared to the typical iForum format.  It is very good timing that Geek Speak Live exists and the hope of everyone is that it will continue for the next Synergy/iForum.

The key message that was repeated often is honesty is always better.  If the product has limitations, then those limitations need to be known.  Customers who are misled will remember the deception and be unlikely to try it again.  Expectations set at the right level are more likely to lead to a long term relationship.

A good analogy is dating.  You can start off by pretending to be something that you are not.  You might even fool the other person for some time.  Eventually your true self is going to emerge and the party is over.  On the other hand, if you are only you and confess to your weaknesses, it is the other person that decides if they can handle it.  You have given them the power to choose versus trying to misled them.  If they decided that they don’t like you for who you really are, then it was not meant to be.  It is far better to know up front than to make it to a much a later stage where everyone has wasted their time.

In this way, it is better to be straight forward.  The customer will respect the honesty and be more likely to trust what is being said.

Having written all this, it is now time to say that Shawn had a lot of guts to say what he did.  Brian Madden thought Shawn was either brave or naive to give such a presentation.  However, Brian also confessed that “Shawn is my hero”.  Potentially Shawn could have damaged his relationship with Citrix.  I have heard nothing to say this is the case.  I would interpret the results something like this:  Citrix opens floodgates, Shawn takes Citrix for its word, Citrix realizes it might have opened too wide, Citrix then realizes later that this is the price of allowing open communication.  Truthfully, I see this particular incident in a very positive light.  One of the most dangerous things you can do is believe your own hype.  Sometimes you need someone to remind you of this fact.

The Next 5000 Days of the Web

Last year Kevin Kelly gave a presentation about the next 5000 days of the web.  His views are based on what happened in the first 5000 days (roughly 13 1/2 years).  The profile for Kevin reveals a very thoughtful man.  He is in a good position to imagine what the future will bring.

Instead of talking about existing and emerging technologies, Kevin instead focuses on the more likely outcomes in the more distant future.  The point that stuck with me is that the impossible is going to be possible.  The same point of view could be expressed at the beginning of the web.  Many impossible things became common place.  And somehow, we take this for granted now.

He says “It’s amazing, and we are not amazed”.  How true.  It is only when there is a major shift that we take notice.  There is a counter point to his idea.  If we do not grow up with the technology as being new, we are more likely to be impressed.  This means older people (older than being born in the early to mid 80s) are far more likely to be impressed with the evolving web.  I admit that I am often amazed by what has happened in such a short period of time.  Perhaps if I was younger I would take it much more for granted.

He also says that originally the web was thought of as “being like TV but better”.  This model proved to be untrue.  It is clear now that we tend to shove new ideas under existing ideas to better understand them.  The web was not TV and except for the ability to playback shows, will never be the same as TV.

Kevin then states that the first lesson of the web is that we “have to get better in believing the impossible”.  This just means that things that were perceived as impossible in theory were actually possible in practice. 

This is just summarizing what Kevin says in the video.  I don’t want to give it all away but will focus on the topics that most interest me.

Kevin sees the web as a more organic mechanism that resembles the human brain in complexity.  He sees the web as a single machine which also happens to be the most interesting machine humans have ever created.  The parallels with the brain are reflected in current measurements of both the web and average brain.  Currently we are sitting at the equivalent level of one human brain based on connections and neurons.  Kevin projects that in 30 years we will reach the equivalent of 6 billion human brains on the web and therefore the web will surpass raw human computation (which assumes that only 6 billion people will be alive then).

The shift in his thinking is based largely on treating the entire web as one machine.  This is where cloud computing is heading along with the rest of the computer industry.  Isolation is becoming more and more rare as machines are becoming more linked together than ever.  Devices become windows into the machine.

There are three categories of change coming in the next 5000 days.

  1. Embodiment
  2. Restructuring
  3. Codependency

Embodiment means that we are going to incorporate more different types of devices to make the web even more diverse.  This includes things like mobile phones and other portable devices.  As things become more and more digital, the more likely it will participate with the web.  Many of the new models being put forward mix hardware in reality with virtual things in the web.  The web will also be seen as the owner of all the bits so that locally stored things will only be there for the sake of caching or offline use.

Restructuring comes with the concept of linking together data instead of just pages.  This calls for a much more intensive linking mechanism that would cross over many current boundaries.  There are some brief examples today of how this would be useful but the overall story has yet to be developed.  I would see this as an exploration in linking data together in a way that is much more natural and helpful to the users.  It would be of much more use currently in individual companies.  In a way, it addresses the need to search for relevant topics.  Links would already exist between similar ideas or objects and instead of searching, the points could be traversed.  It is a very different idea from how the web is deployed today.

Codependency comes from unloading the need to remember things.  The web will become our memory in a way.  When we need the information, we will just retrieve it when we need it.  This process is due to become more and more simpler.  The web will become further entrenched in our lives and we will become more dependant. 

The video is worth watching and is certainly much different than other talks given about the future of the web.  Even though several points could be challenged, it is not hard to see that the overall vision has merit.  Perhaps the overall message is that the machine is being built and will evolve based on our needs but we are not necessarily in full control of the overall path given its worldwide nature. 

Citrix, by comparison, is only about four years older than the web.  So many things have changed since 1989 and there are still so many things left to do.  At least it is much more clear what will happen based on our own experiences as a company.  It might be nice to conjure up a post about the future of Citrix based on its past.  That will have to wait for another time. 

Thanks Kala for the link to this video!

Irresistible Forces and Movable Objects

Force and Object

Pat Helland from Microsoft gave a presentation last year at TechEd in EMEA called “The Irresistable Forces Meet the Movable Objects“. I received a copy from Kala at work. Not long after reading it I wanted to find out more. This lead to finding the video version. Click on the link with the videoid=706 tag. You will also need to sign on with a Microsoft passport ID (hotmail id works).

This presentation is compelling not only because it includes lots of trend analysis but also because it answers questions to problems that are only beginning to happen. Pat had worked for years for Microsoft before going to Amazon. Only recently he has returned to Microsoft. I believe the experiences from both Microsoft and Amazon has helped him reach some unique insights.

I highly recommend either watching the PowerPoint presentation or the video. The video has the extra bonus of including an internal Microsoft video about devices and the cloud. It almost is ad quality but reveals how Microsoft has invested heavily in their perceived future in the cloud computing space.

Ever wonder why the CPU clock rates aren’t going up much higher? That question is answered towards the beginning. The speed curve is supposed around 3.8 GHz in 2009 with the slope getting flatter. The reason is that the performance of the CPU is impacted by heat and the amount of power needed for that speed. The hotter the chip, the more power it takes to operate which leads to more heat. The smaller the transistors, the more power that is needed. The faster the frequency, the more power is needed. The smaller and faster you get, the more power you need and the hotter you get. It is a good example of diminishing returns. As you go further and further, the heat and power grow exponentially without much to show for it.

Pat predicts a 10% speed gain maximum per year over the next several years.

Memory continues to support a latency of around 60ns for retrieval. There does not appear to be anything that will improve this in the near term. The processors always want more data but the memory relatively slow.

The size of transistors will continue to shrink. Currently we are at 45nm with a projected size of 8nm in 2018. This translates to having many more cores per chip. Currently we can have 8 cores per chip but it projected by 2018 we will have upwards of 256 cores. By having multiple cores is a way around the frequency limitations. The idea is to give multiple engines to drive the applications which will make the applications run faster as if they were on a faster single processor. Another possible trend is to put memory onto to the CPU to allow faster access and have it be shared between the cores. It is much cheaper to buy and support multiple core chips than buy a must faster single core CPU.

With data centers, 40% of the cost is power. The building around the data center is only around 15% of the cost. Saving power translates to saving power for air conditioning as well. Backup power supplies take around 20% of the budget.

In storage, It is projected that there will be 10 Terabyte disks in 2010 for around $100. Flash will equal SATA storage costs in around 2012. Flash runs much cheaper and cooler than standard disk storage. It is projected that a 128GB Flash disk will cost $40 in 2010. The performance of Flash is better than disk and relatively low power. Flash also can have a much wider pipe.

In communications, 100Gbit/s LAN speeds will be viable in 2011. Total bandwidth is seen to triple every 12 months. Latency will continue to be a problem. Wireless will continue to grow but will not cover everyone. Signal loss will still be possible even in populated areas. Being offline will still be important.

Given the wide ranging topics, it would be better for you to see this information for yourself. What I have summarized is really just a taste. Hopefully you will be inspired to find out more.

I’ve been interested in cloud computing over the last year. It didn’t seem clear how certain problems were going to be solved in this space. With Pat’s presentation, many aspects of this are now much clearer. It does indicate some pretty big shifts that are about to happen to both the producers and consumers of this kind of technology range. Strangely enough, I see what Pat suggests as making computer systems behave a bit more like biological elements. By this, I mean that it is new to allow a computer system to act more autonomously with the possibility for making a mistake. When things become more decentralized, computer systems are going to have to make educated guesses without some central server telling them what is right and wrong. In fact, there will be no central server. It becomes more a living system with divergent results which ultimately come together in the end. It might seem like science fiction but in reality this kind of working is not far off from becoming real.

BitLocker Overview

BitLocker logo

BitLocker gets mentioned more and more lately.  I understood the concept but didn’t know the details.  While looking for something else, I can across a great video about BitLocker technology from Microsoft.  Also Wikipedia has a BitLocker page.

I didn’t know that BitLocker could use TPM.  I also didn’t know that Microsoft had invested so much work into making the drive secure.  It is a very well thought out story.

The video is highly recommended to developers since it explains the use of TPM clearly.  It does not go too deep but just enough to convey the basic workings with BitLocker.

It would make sense for businesses with laptops/notebooks/tablets to embrace this technology.  It is a easy way to protect the disks in portable machines.  The default case calls for TPM but also provides a seamless experience.  The user would not need a PIN or USB key to supply the key to unlock the drive.  The boot process would be transparent but yet protect against someone else getting access to the information.

The Wikipedia article mentions some weaknesses.  Overall these weaknesses are not a serious threat.  The biggest problem with Vista with BitLocker was the inability to encrypt non-boot drives.  This was recently solved by SP1 and the release of WIndows Server 2008.

Only the highest end of licensing covers including BitLocker.  It is a fairly good incentive to get it unless you are looking for a non-Microsoft solution that would perhaps not be as integrated.

Russell Humphries is the presenter in the Microsoft BitLocker video.  After the recent February 2008 memory key reconstruction effort, he replied in the Windows Vista Security Blog.

Russell makes a great point during the presentation that security and usability are always a balance.  I would argue that they are actually at opposite sides of the scale.  Lately the push has been for more security which tends to reduce usability.  The BitLocker team tried best to reach a usable range.

Good to Great Video Explanation

This is where understanding “Good to Great” should get a whole lot easier.  If you have an hour to spare and are curious but don’t feel like reading the book yet, watch this video.  Charlie Rose, famous on PBS in America, interviews Jim Collins and covers the “Good to Great” topics during this hour long video.

They explore the myths of business and how great companies are not built from these myths.  It is a very open honest exploration of what it takes to make a great company.  Charlie Rose can be very focused and even challenging of his guests.  In this case he appears to like what Jim Collins has to say.  They seem more like friends than the typical interview process.

I see this video as an easy way to learn the “Good to Great” basics.

Knowledge Navigator

The recent post about the “Starfire” video led to the discovery of the “Knowledge Navigator” video.  This video by Apple predates the “Starfire” version from Sun by six years.  Considering that it was built twenty years ago, it is very interesting.

Some of the technology has arrived (like flat screens and video conferencing) but the artificial intelligence and decent speech detection are greatly lacking.  Like the “Starfire” video, it is more people based than just about the technology.  In fact, this video presents a very transparent view into how this kind of technology would blend in.

Around 1994, Netscape decided to call their web browser Navigator.  I wonder if there was any connection.

For a more detailed analysis of “Knowledge Navigator” please read the summary at User Interface Engineering blog.

Starfire Video

Starfire video

Yet another surprise today.  I found a video produced by a team at Sun in 1994.  It is in a similar format and style to the internally famous “Virtual Workplace” video produced in 2001.  It is called the “Starfire” video and it tries to capture what will be available in 2004.

It is extremely well produced.  The budget must have been very large.  There are even a couple of actors that look familiar even though I would not be able to name them.

“Julie was looking forward to a good day until Michael O’Connor tried to deep-six her sports car project. Now, only her team, scattered around the world, can save her…”

The film, developed in 1992, predicted the explosive growth of the world wide web at a time before graphical web browsers even existed. Starfire: The Directors’ Cut explores in candid detail a technological future based on industry cooperation, human-centered design, and the continued presence of bad guys.

The film, although 14 years old, is still fresh.  Surprisingly, it is also still very futuristic.  The workspace is probably at least another 10 years away for common deployment.

What impressed me the most was the human interaction was very real and believable.  In other words, it had a more human touch than a typical high tech video.

It is fairly big (240MB) so be prepared to wait a bit for the download.  It uses MP4 and needs QuickTime to run.

I really enjoyed watching this video.  At times you forget about the technology since it does actually a story as well.  The moral of the story might be that you should work from home if you have a cold and that you should never marry someone that likes to pretend being HAL.

Enjoy!

Bill and Steve Meeting History

D5 video showing when Bill and Steve were together.

Steve and Bill have only been seen together around 5 times.

  1. 1983 Apple Mac discussion with Dating Game spoof
  2. 1991 Fortune magazine interview
  3. 1997 MacWorld
  4. 2005 D3
  5. 2007 D5

The referenced video documents what happened during the first four “meetings”. Actually, they were only together on stage for 1983 and 2007. The 1997 MacWorld event used a video link. The Fortune interview appears to have happened at Steve’s house. At D3, they were on stage separately.

The early 1983 video is probably the most interesting since it reveals a co-dependence between Microsoft and Apple at the time. Bill looked so young then.

I missed this the first time around. I would have listed this first since the video was intended as the prologue.

The limited number of meetings indicate competition but probably also different focus points. The 1997 speech by Steve shows the early acceptance of not trying to stir up Microsoft. At that point things would have been a bit sensitive given the darker years of Apple. There is a great writeup about Steve’s return to Apple on Wikipedia. I did not know that Apple had bought NeXT or that it was the basis for OS X. I also did not know that he is only a $1 a year salary. Not to worry, he does have lots of stock options.

The more I learn about Bill Gates and Steve Jobs the more interesting the stories become. These are certainly not boring people that only know technology. Both have a great deal of savvy that has helped them to become the business leaders they are now.

This is mostly just filler. Watch the video! It is almost guaranteed that you will get a kick out of the “Dating Game” sequence where Steve is the one looking for a date. Bill is one of the candidates.

This kind of material is typically so rare and that is probably why I bothered to post about it in the first place.